How many times have you written a detailed lesson plan only to find that during the lesson you suddenly realizes that something you needed prepared isn’t prepared. Or that something you thought was an arm’s reach away is really across the room? Or an instruction you need to communicate as soon as students walk in isn’t written on the board like you had wanted?
As a new teacher, I found that this happened more than I liked during my first week. I had written a good plan with all the instructions and steps I’d need to follow. I’d used a format I’d been using in school and for a few of my previous jobs. So I wasn’t sure what the problem was.
And then my “Organizer Extraordinaire” side kicked in. The lessons themselves were fine. The physical layouts of the plans (also called the templates) were not. And that, I realized, was what was throwing me off. Just like the physical layout of a space can be counterproductive to whatever needs to be happening in the space, the design of my templates was less than optimal for maximum effectiveness.
You might be thinking, How hard could this be?
The traditional lesson plan template looks something like this:
True, not all lesson plans look exactly like this. Some of these labels are ordered differently, some are renamed. Google “lesson plan template” and you’ll find several different types organized in different ways, and depending on your subject, one may be better for you than for a colleague teaching a different subject. But I find that the majority of plans list their categories vertically like this, and that is what causes me to become disorganized very quickly.
It’s got all the categories a teacher needs to consider consolidated in one place. But when I thought about it, the order of some of these made no sense to me. For example, why would a Resource list be last when that’s probably one of the first things you need to know to set up a lesson? Why would your Assessment field be separated from the Objective when the two are inextricably linked? I thought, if certain fields naturally go together, why not list them a) together, and b) side by side?
So I redesigned my template to work for me based mainly on how I think and what would make me most successful as the classroom leader.
At the top is a place for my Unit name, which I never see on traditional templates. Then to the right of that is a place for me to write which classes the plan is for, and when I see them. I see two sections of each grade, and sometimes I see them broken up between two weeks. I also want to know which lesson it is in the sequence of my unit, and that may not always be the same for each section. So this layout is better for me than simply putting a date or a grade. I want to build good habits starting now, which means labeling my plans as clearly as possible.
Then I have Objective, Assessment, and Standards all in one line. An objective by definition is measurable, so I want them side by side, not on opposite ends of the plan. Additionally, each objective should address certain standards (national and/or district). When I flip through these later, I want that information at the top for easy access, and I want to see it linked with how I met that standard.
This next part is the most helpful. I split Resources between Procedures, Differentiation, and Homework because I wanted to see exactly what I needed for each step in my plan and where it should be placed. I also added Prep because some resources, well, need to be prepared. And I need to know that before starting a lesson. An isolated uncontextualized list of resources was not beneficial. This lets me see what I need for each step and how I need to prepare it. I can check off items as they’re completed, which makes me feel even more secure about the plan’s execution.
The only thing I can think of that I might add is a place for notes on how well a lesson went or on student participation and behavior. For now, I just write it in any blank space on the page.
Here’s a pdf of my template: Lesson Plan_ADifferentMusician
But I encourage you to make your own. If your district has universal templates they want you to use, talk to them about the advantages of an individualized plan. After all, what you’re really asking is for them to differentiate, which is a cornerstone of teaching. No matter what your district’s decision, an honest conversation about differentiating for teachers might encourage everyone to see things from new points of view.